Main menu:


Site search:

RSS Feeds

Email Subscription
Your email address:

 

Categories

Most Viewed

Recent Comments

Archive

Archive for the year 2006

The myth of the million dollar pen

Did NASA really spend $1 million for a space pen, while the soviet’s used a simple pencil? This is a common story that, it turns out, is not quite true…

Fact or Fiction?: NASA Spent Millions to Develop a Pen that Would Write in Space, whereas the Soviet Cosmonauts Used a Pencil

During the height of the space race in the 1960s, legend has it, NASA scientists realized that pens could not function in space. They needed to figure out another way for the astronauts to write things down. So they spent years and millions of taxpayer dollars to develop a pen that could put ink to paper without gravity. But their crafty Soviet counterparts, so the story goes, simply handed their cosmonauts pencils. This tale with its message of simplicity and thrift–not to mention a failure of common sense in a bureaucracy–floats around the Internet, hopping from in-box to in-box, and even surfaced during a 2002 episode of the West Wing. But, alas, it is just a myth.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Doing the obvious to create magic, or fraud

When considering magic, or fraud, people often fail to consider the most obvious and devious ways in which the deception could be pulled off. I have often hear statements like: “The couldn’t do it that way, it is too obvious.” But why not do the obvious, if it makes the deception work.

Here is an interesting article from Skeptical Inquirer about deception, improvising, and the Amazing Randi.

The Devious Art of Improvising

The great fake psychics are great improvisationists. This means that a really good pseudo-psychic is able to produce phenomena under almost any circumstance. A quick mind and a good knowledge of the techniques and psychology of deception are all that is needed. Sometimes, only a quick mind is enough.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Laughing is social

Bodyhack

Why Adam Sandler is Funny in a Theater

New research could explain why some comedians are funnier when you’re surrounded by laughing people instead of sitting by yourself.

In a new study, researchers found that the brain appears to prime itself for laughter when it hears someone laughing: This response occurs in the area of the brain that is activated when we smile, as though preparing our facial muscles to laugh.

But why? “We usually encounter positive emotions, such as laughter or cheering, in group situations, whether watching a comedy programme with family or a football game with friends,” says [a researcher]. “This response in the brain, automatically priming us to smile or laugh, provides a way of mirroring the behaviour of others, something which helps us interact socially.

It could play an important role in building strong bonds between individuals in a group.”

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Are passwords getting better?

There is an interesting article on password characteristics by Bruce Schneier on Wired News:

“How good are the passwords people are choosing to protect their computers and online accounts?

It’s a hard question to answer because data is scarce. But recently, a colleague sent me some spoils from a MySpace phishing attack: 34,000 actual user names and passwords…

…passwords are getting better. I’m impressed that less than 4 percent were dictionary words and that the great majority were at least alphanumeric.”

Wired News: MySpace Passwords Aren’t So Dumb


Technorati Tags: , , , ,

A look at a phishing operation

Here is a scary article about a huge phishing operation that may be responsible for half of the phishing messages on the Internet.

‘Rock Phish’ blamed for surge in phishing


No one can say for sure where Rock Phish is based, or if the group operates out of a single country. “They are sort of the Keyser Söze of phishing,” said Zulfikar Ramzan, senior principal researcher with Symantec’s Security Response group, referring to the secretive criminal kingpin in the 1995 film “The Usual Suspects.” “They’re doing some pretty scary things out there,” he added.

Technorati Tags: ,

Complementary medicines useless and dangerous

Here is an interesting article on complementary/alternative medicine. Have a look at the comments as well, since they present the usual collection of justifications, reactions, and anecdotes.

Complementary medicines are useless and dangerous, says Britain’s foremost expert

Useless. Dangerous. Even crooked. The brutal verdict on our most popular complementary cures – by Britain’s foremost expert:

A lot of complementary medicine is ineffective, and some positively dangerous. Meanwhile, alternative treatments that promise to cure cancer ‘are downright irresponsible, if not criminal’.

These are the views not of an old-school doctor dismissive of alternative therapies, but of Professor Edzard Ernst, Britain’s first professor of complementary medicine and, you would have assumed, its greatest champion.

A lot of interest groups were very puzzled because, surely, complementary medicine was, by and large, very safe, and mainstream medicine was where you had side-effects,’ says Ernst, who is professor of complementary medicine at the Peninsula Medical School at the universities of Exeter and Plymouth.

‘But when we did our research we found a lot of surprises – and since we started our work 13 years ago, various things have been banned from the market because they are so unsafe.’

his department has published well over 1,000 research papers and tested a hugely diverse number of therapies, making it the most productive research unit in the world in this field.

How couples handle good and bad news

For Couples, Reaction to Good News Matters More Than Reaction to Bad

Scientists who study relationships have long focused on how couples handle love’s headaches, the cold silences and searing blowups, the childcare crises and work stress, the fallouts over money and ex-lovers. But the way that partners respond to each other’s triumphs may be even more important for the health of a relationship, suggests a paper appearing in the current issue of The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. The study found that the way a person responds to a partner’s good fortune — with excitement or passive approval, shared pride or indifference — is the most crucial factor in tightening a couple’s bond, or undermining it.

Cool data


Some of the best research is hard to publish, but very profound. This article talks about gathering “cool data”.

Brian Wansink on Research Design

I’m a big believer in cool data. The design goal is: How far can we possibly push it so that it makes it a vivid point? Most academics push it just far enough to get it published. I try to push it beyond that to make it much more vivid. That’s what [Stanley] Milgram did with his experiments. First, he showed obedience to authority in the lab. Then he stripped away a whole lot of things to show how extreme it was. He took away lab coats, the college campus. That’s what made it so powerful.

Protecting yourself from identity theft

Here is some practical advice on protecting yourself from identity theft.

Twelve Ways to protect yourself from Identity Theft

Every year thousands of Canadians are victims of identity theft. Although the number of identity theft victims is relatively small, the financial impact to an individual whose identity is stolen can be profound. In this article, Digital Home examines what identity theft is, how it happens, suggests twelve ways you can protect yourself from it, and finally what steps to take if you think you are a victim.

Cognitive Seduction and the “peekaboo” law

Here is an interesting article on cognitive principles of aesthetics. Do a search of popular photos on Flickr, perhaps using a neat tool like Flickr Leech, and you will find lots of examples of this technique.

Creating Passionate Users: Cognitive Seduction and the “peekaboo” law

Brains are turned on by puzzles. Brains are turned on by figuring things out. Brains are turned on by even the smallest “aha” moments. And despite what some of you (*cough* men *cough*) might believe, the brain is more turned on by seeing just the arms of a naked woman behind a shower curtain than it is by seeing all of her. So if you’re trying to engage someone’s brain, don’t show everything. Let their brain connect the dots.