<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Department of Energy reduces, but does not eliminate, polygraph testing (lie detectors)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:22:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DDan</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/comment-page-1#comment-42393</link>
		<dc:creator>DDan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/#comment-42393</guid>
		<description>Not surprising in anything but the length of time it took them to act on this bit of &#039;snake oil&#039;.  &#039;Lie detectors&#039; never have been worth the money for the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprising in anything but the length of time it took them to act on this bit of &#8217;snake oil&#8217;.  &#8216;Lie detectors&#8217; never have been worth the money for the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Patrick &#187; Pre-employment polygraph screen in Halifax</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/comment-page-1#comment-20007</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Patrick &#187; Pre-employment polygraph screen in Halifax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/#comment-20007</guid>
		<description>[...] US Department of Energy reduces, but does not eliminate, polygraph testing (lie detectors) - 1,994 views [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US Department of Energy reduces, but does not eliminate, polygraph testing (lie detectors) &#8211; 1,994 views [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/comment-page-1#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/security-and-privacy/us-department-of-energy-reduces-but-does-not-eliminate-polygraph-testing-lie-detectors/#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Well, the widespread &quot;random&quot; testing has begun. &lt;a href=&quot;http://lanl-the-rest-of-the-story.blogspot.com/2007/04/doe-polygraph-program.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pinky and the Brain&lt;/a&gt; are reporting an internal memo at LANL that describes the same old nonsense of polygraph screening and job loss if the tests are &quot;failed&quot;. Interesting reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the widespread &#8220;random&#8221; testing has begun. <a href="http://lanl-the-rest-of-the-story.blogspot.com/2007/04/doe-polygraph-program.html">Pinky and the Brain</a> are reporting an internal memo at LANL that describes the same old nonsense of polygraph screening and job loss if the tests are &#8220;failed&#8221;. Interesting reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
