Junk science in the courtroom

New research on psychological tests has

found that many tests used in courtrooms are considered scientifically unreliable; in the headline, the journal dubbed them “junk science.”

A team of lawyers and psychologists reviewed 364 exams used in the legal system, finding a third of them don’t pass muster with forensic mental health experts.

Source: A New Study Challenges the Reliability of Court Psych Exams

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *